QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 03:54
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 58.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 411
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Device(107D 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.1% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 117
Parallax 122
105% 122 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,209
Write 303
Mixed 503
146% 672 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 23.2
73% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 80.9
DQ Write 51.4
DQ Mixed 63.5
48% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
49GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.2
Write 26.3
Mixed 61.7
66% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
56% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0C2 DELL P2418D
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback