OFF Nokia PureBook Lite 14

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemOFF Nokia PureBook Lite 14  (all builds)
MotherboardOFF Nokia PureBook Lite 14
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 21:47
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 159
54% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 230
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.6
5% 6.87 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 3.8
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 305
Write 85
Mixed 131
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 15.5
54% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 51.3
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 63.9
56% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 89%
SDXC Card 126GB
118GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.2
Write 16.2
Mixed 16.2
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
83% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.1% Above average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical Nokia PureBook Lite 14 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: OFF Nokia PureBook Lite 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback