Asus F1A55-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 08:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 641
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 86.4
42% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 172
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 9.31
8% 10.8 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 14.9
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 4TB
193GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 56.4
Mixed 54.7
40% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.95
4K Write 4.39
4K Mixed 0.99
272% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
52netbar iShareDisk 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 60.4
Mixed 51.3
44% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.28
4K Write 4.53
4K Mixed 1.26
319% 2.69 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback