Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 06:30
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 600
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Lighting 81.9
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 72.1
67% 79 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 79.2
63% 76.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 2.2 2.7 2.1 1.8 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 21%
52netbar iShareDisk 4TB
152GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 20 20 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 43.3
Mixed 47
SusWrite 25.5
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 5.4
862% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 36%
52netbar iShareDisk 960GB
172GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 20 20 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 57.5
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 25.6
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 5.8
980% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 24.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback