Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 178 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 328 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1497) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870EVO 500G 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8301c70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 322 170 15 9.1 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 364 Write 329 Mixed 294 SusWrite 142 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 25 86% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 78.2 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 114 99% 142 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773EB0-CK0 M378B5773EB0-CK0 M378B5773EB0-CK0 M378B5773QB0-CK0 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.1% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 11.8 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	6%	63	38	31	60	0"	1280 961	Default

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16