Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 124% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration	445 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 145 2-Core 286 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 984 93% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,484 92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6694) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 173 Parallax 184 136% 175 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 173 Splatting 114 110% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 707GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1959 1982 1960 1837 1727 1713 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	319% Outstanding	Read 2,430 Write 2,220 Mixed 2,198 SusWrite 1,863 490% 2,178 MB/s	4K Read 60.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 70.6 237% 78.2 MB/s	DQ Read 877 DQ Write 685 DQ Mixed 785 586% 782 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 319% Great: 488%
ROG ESD-S1C 500GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 179GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.4% Poor	Read 38 Write 41.9 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 42 9% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 16 55% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 25.2 DQ Mixed 25.4 19% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 93%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 278GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1747 1648 1645 1654 1643 1464 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	318% Outstanding	Read 2,529 Write 2,277 Mixed 1,033 SusWrite 1,634 418% 1,868 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 78.7 250% 85.1 MB/s	DQ Read 949 DQ Write 781 DQ Mixed 476 462% 735 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 318% Great: 410%
Seagate Backup+ Hub WH 8TB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 168 172 172 168 169 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 93%
G-tech ArmorATD 5TB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2.5TB free Firmware: 2004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 105 107 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 132 Write 90.7 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 105 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.8 244% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 70%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 157 Write 44 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 40.6 55% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 183 Write 40.5 Mixed 57 SusWrite 39.6 59% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 105%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB 623 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 202 Write 40.3 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 35.9 62% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 114%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB 623 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 37 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 208 Write 39.5 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 36.3 62% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 114%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB 623 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 43 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 208 Write 37.9 Mixed 58 SusWrite 42.1 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 114%
WD WD80EMZZ-00TBGA0 8TB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 35 34 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 117%
WD WD80EMZZ-00TBGA0 8TB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 34 34 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 117%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB 623 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 178 Write 40.2 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 36.1 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 114%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 127 126 120 123 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 126 Write 135 Mixed 110 SusWrite 124 169% 124 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 1.1 371% 5.3 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 7 DQ Mixed 1.6 296% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 103%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 12TB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2TB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 266 260 248 255 269 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 300 Write 297 Mixed 91 SusWrite 260 310% 237 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.2 142% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 32.4 102% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 46.2 SC Mixed 32.3 96% 33.7 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	30	72.3"	1280 720	GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	961x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	285x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16