Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 19:25
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 882
94% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 108
Parallax 122
100% 118 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 112
Splatting 93.7
90% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2313 2161 2290 2380 2465 2472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 1,998
Write 2,548
Mixed 2,096
SusWrite 2,347
509% 2,247 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 78.9
280% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 1,065
788% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 356%
Great: 394%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
159GB free
Firmware: VC2S038D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1115 1061 332 115 121 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1347
Write 1,188
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 478
227% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62
215% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 1,069
DQ Mixed 856
654% 870 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 189%
Great: 320%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
495GB free
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 398 439 434 438 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 462
Mixed 394
SusWrite 434
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 35.3
144% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 158
137% 196 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 177 182 183 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 181
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M2E3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 27.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.8
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C03 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback