Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 09:21
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 161
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 820
88% 699 Pts
64-Core 978
61% 978 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 109
Parallax 124
103% 120 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 114
Splatting 97.5
93% 116 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2355 2405 2462 2546 2531 2530 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 1,742
Write 2306
Mixed 1,942
SusWrite 2,472
480% 2,115 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 79.5
277% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,112
820% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 354%
Great: 394%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
358GB free
Firmware: VC2S038D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1154 1180 1181 1166 1175 1110 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,291
Write 1,165
Mixed 962
SusWrite 1161
258% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.5
211% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 854
636% 831 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 224%
Great: 320%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
481GB free
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 440 437 438 440 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 350
Write 423
Mixed 365
SusWrite 443
90% 395 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 30.7
132% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 176
141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 143 141 140 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 163
Write 158
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 141
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 108%
FSS SSD 17TB
15.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 54.8
Write 13.2
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 18.8
29% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 3
174% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M2E3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.2
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 27" 1280 720 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback