Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory104.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 16:02
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 181
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 701
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,742
108% 1,742 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 9.3
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 9.9
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 87 85 51 55 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 110
Write 100
Mixed 112
SusWrite 69.6
22% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 13.2
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 28.1
DQ Mixed 27.6
42% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 80%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
193GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 981 926 906 909 989 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1988
Write 1,594
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 944
340% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 48.3
158% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 567
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 469
342% 452 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 206%
Great: 435%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
220GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 420 370 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 671
Write 580
Mixed 547
SusWrite 267
116% 516 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 40.9
135% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 323
297% 461 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 109%
Great: 282%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
381GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 75 73 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 82.3
Write 51.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 75
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 101%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
442GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 165 159 165 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 124
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 164
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
549GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 34.1
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 DEL407E DELL U2713HM
Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback