Gigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 15:07
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 72.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 997
87% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 119
Parallax 138
108% 130 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 97 112 129 137 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 435
Write 373
Mixed 314
SusWrite 144
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 11.6
71% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 31.5
44% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
311GB free
Firmware: HPS1104J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 365 361 406 412 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 454
Write 414
Mixed 354
SusWrite 395
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 12.5
122% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 9.1
70% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 102%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
146GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1166 1096 1043 352 349 352 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,473
Write 1,147
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 726
255% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 74.3
259% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 839
670% 924 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 226%
Great: 223%
SSK Storage 250GB
44GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 306 303 327 327 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 387
Write 285
Mixed 372
SusWrite 344
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 26.7
122% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 88.5
114% 204 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 85%
Rsh-339 ASM1153E 3TB
615GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 63 64 68 67 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 113
Write 107
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 66.5
71% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3 2.8 3.2 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 99.2
Write 10.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 3
26% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
52% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 13 0 84.6" 1280 720 TSB3700 55UHD_LCD_TV
Typical GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 3,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $767
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback