Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509UA
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200930
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 57.1 35% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 142 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620 8,599 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1A31) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 5.1 2% 3.93 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB 3,926 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 69 90 82 123 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 376 Write 197 Mixed 266 SusWrite 106 177% 236 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 7.9 1,499% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 166%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 112GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 47 46 45 85 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 70.6 Write 70.9 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 64.7 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 168% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	48	60	15.5"	1280 721	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA

CPU
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	119x
Pentium 4417UIntelBench 48%, 2,782 samples	7x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics 620IntelBench 4%, 8,599 samples	85x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	34x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	7x

SSD
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GBNvmeBench 103%, 4,910 samples	24x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	21x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	20x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	31x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	25x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16