Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1728 x 1026 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 07:37
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$31
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 91.2
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 121
64% 100 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 125
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.1% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 42.7
37% 45.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 0.2
19% 26.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 480GB 480GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 67 71 74 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 330
Write 104
Mixed 128
SusWrite 69
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 21.6
83% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 114
97% 149 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.4 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 349
Write 3.7
SusWrite 4
81% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 42 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM02FF SAMSUNG
Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback