MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A DDR4  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 16:24
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 175
2-Core 311
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 947
93% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,191
74% 1,191 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 178
Parallax 181
149% 181 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
207GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2069 2136 746 787 669 550 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,494
Write 2,246
Mixed 1,637
SusWrite 1,160
370% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 73.5
249% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,302
978% 1,309 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 266%
Great: 298%
Xraydisk 2TB PRO 2TB
953GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11564
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1718 1938 2029 2017 2028 2007 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 1,440
Write 1,944
Mixed 1,599
SusWrite 1,956
394% 1,734 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 74.2
252% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 536
564% 944 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 306%
Great: 306%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
109GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 110 82 81 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 410
Write 218
Mixed 230
SusWrite 116
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 17.7
68% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 39.9
47% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
180GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 143 129 150 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 152
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 19,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4 - $144

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback