Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 343
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 989
104% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,108
68% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Gigabyte(1458 410A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 116
Parallax 154
137% 146 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
115% 147 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 1124 603 258 184 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,975
Write 1,053
Mixed 916
SusWrite 575
250% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 54.7
208% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 459
385% 540 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 203%
Great: 241%
WD Green 240GB (2016)
69GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 158 147 141 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 483
Write 444
Mixed 389
SusWrite 154
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 23.3
128% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 14.5
78% 174 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
788GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 78.8
Write 90.2
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 88.3
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 34.6
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 27" 1280 720 XMI2701 Mi Monitor
Typical A520M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback