HP Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 03:36
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 280
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,031
95% 795 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 115
Parallax 117
101% 119 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 107
Splatting 97.2
92% 114 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 1320 1400 1432 1430 1425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,342
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 1,304
286% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 68.8
228% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 269
321% 553 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 239%
Great: 255%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 456 466 296 297 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 415
Mixed 389
SusWrite 351
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 36.7
133% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 337
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 201 201 198 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 143
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 200
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ND4U1632162BRQDE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 23.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 34" 3440 1440 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback