HP Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230828
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 02:50
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 965
92% 760 Pts
64-Core 925
57% 925 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3560 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 117
Parallax 120
103% 121 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 109
Splatting 99.6
93% 116 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 848 1127 587 363 101 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 1,257
Mixed 945
SusWrite 539
229% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.2
221% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 268
321% 554 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 187%
Great: 255%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 429 461 296 296 296 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 401
Mixed 409
SusWrite 350
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 50
160% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 199 194 197 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 106
Mixed 78
SusWrite 196
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ND4U1632162BRQDE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 23.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34" 3440 1440 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Omen Obelisk 875-0129 DT Rfrbd PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback