PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z790-A WIFI (all builds) |
Memory | 51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20230908 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 24 '23 at 02:03 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-13400F-$175
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
99.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 273 246 256 247 253 MB/s
|
66.3%
Good
|
|||
Samsung MZ7L37T6HBLA-00A07 7.5TB
859GB free
Firmware: JXTC304Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 391 387 430 430 431 MB/s
|
68.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KF552C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
|
162%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 56 | 30 | 75 | 27" | 1280 720 | AUS276C PA278CV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-13700KIntel $314Bench 126%, 41,056 samples | 1,373x |
Core i9-13900KIntel $450Bench 129%, 49,132 samples | 1,125x |
Core i5-13600KIntel $254Bench 122%, 27,559 samples | 440x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples | 627x |
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $750Bench 240%, 46,082 samples | 624x |
RTX 4080Nvidia $990Bench 290%, 22,998 samples | 496x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $2,284 |