Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06JWJY
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2223
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 513
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG80ZNV1T02 NVM 1TB
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 1812 1839 1779 1801 1748 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,734
Write 1,879
Mixed 1,683
SusWrite 1,798
401% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 58.7
198% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 542
414% 572 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 267%
Great: 897%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 8.4
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 2,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback