Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime6 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 173
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 617
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 1,634
101% 1,634 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Duo
AMD(1002 0336) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 58
Parallax 66.4
33% 55.1 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 43.1
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1907 1828 1816 408 246 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,734
Write 2017
Mixed 1,512
SusWrite 1,077
357% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 52.6
168% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 580
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 459
333% 439 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 207%
Great: 317%
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
412GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 429 143 308 109 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 427
Write 107
Mixed 201
SusWrite 263
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 32.7
120% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 209
176% 253 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 103%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
635GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 465 468 467 468 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 457
Mixed 402
SusWrite 466
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 37.7
127% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 348
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 121%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
466GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 464 468 467 452 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 460
Mixed 437
SusWrite 444
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 46.2
147% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 42.5
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 119%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 75 27" 1280 720 HPN354A HP 27f
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback