Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory45.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 22:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.10GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 116
53% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 168
28% 201 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 M393B1K70CHD-CH9 M393B1K70CHD-YH9 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31.9
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback