Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 20:38
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 171
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 465
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 15E0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8798
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.3% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 31.4
27% 30 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 23
22% 26.9 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 502
Write 329
Mixed 384
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 14.4
90% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 13.4
18% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 21.5
Write 112
Mixed 35.6
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.29
105% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback