Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403FA_K403FA

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403FA_K403FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X403FA
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190530
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 56.8 1-Core 34 2-Core 133 42% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 273 27% 222 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1771) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 6.9 5% 6.73 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 9.8 7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 50 70 69 53 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 652 Write 475 Mixed 406 SusWrite 101 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 25 86% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 231 168% 223 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	13	0	13.9"	1280 720	CMN14D4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403FA_K403FA Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403FA_K403FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	9x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	11x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	8x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 141%, 4,269 samples	2x
CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 256GBKlevvBench 159%, 1,003 samples	1x

RAM
K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 8,402 samples	10x
K4E8E324EB-EGCG 2x2GBSamsungBench 56%, 303 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16