HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80A9
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 477
46% 381 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80A9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 7.9
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 39 21 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 440
Write 69.5
Mixed 107
SusWrite 25.3
34% 160 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 16.2
63% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 40.7
44% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
482GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 57 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 55.6
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC5544
Typical Pavilion Gaming Notebook Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback