User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-QD3
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 19:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 151
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 591
53% 446 Pts
64-Core 1,186
73% 1,186 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 94.2
Parallax 115
84% 104 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 98
Splatting 83.9
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 456
Mixed 429
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 31.1
119% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 176
170% 272 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
HP S700 500GB-$60
46GB free
Firmware: R0118A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 415 181 110 35 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 478
Write 417
Mixed 375
SusWrite 209
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 20.5
94% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 34.4
77% 154 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-CF8 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 18
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 BNQ7588 ML2441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback