Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 592 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 152 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 587 52% 444 Pts	64-Core 1,201 74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.85 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 60 Reflection 60 Parallax 60 49% 60 fps	Gravity 60 Splatting 60 53% 60 fps
Poor: 80% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 452 Write 446 Mixed 414 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 36.9 118% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 336 252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
HP S700 500GB-$60 12,813 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 36GB free Firmware: R0118A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 279 289 65 142 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 451 Write 418 Mixed 360 SusWrite 200 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 19.6 86% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 33.5 72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-CF8 4x16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (85^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 24.9 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	23.5"	1920 1080	BNQ7588 ML2441

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16