bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory20.3 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 18:32
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 134
54% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 406
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual SATA Hard Drive 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 148 122 172 160 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 277
Write 262
Mixed 265
SusWrite 149
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 23.5
69% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 141
107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-256MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB 23GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096, 2048, 1024, 256, 128, 64 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 43
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 15
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 17 64 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback