bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 573 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 18:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU 0, 6 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 76.1
35% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 461
37% 322 Pts
64-Core 917
57% 917 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 913GB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.5 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 28% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.7
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback