Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 153
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 358
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.1% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 66.6
41% 56.3 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 37.4
39% 48.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 31 31 24 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB
21GB free
Firmware: HP14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 113
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion HDD 1TB
166GB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 5R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 10% 123 387 248 30 34.1" 2560 1017 GSM5BB9 LG HDR WFHD
Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback