Asus X550JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X550JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JF
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 07:02
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 171
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 456
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 930M
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.7
7% 8.3 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 246 243 244 236 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 439
Mixed 352
SusWrite 269
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 46
153% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 340
256% 341 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15CA
Typical X550JF Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback