Asus X550JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X550JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JF
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 04:37
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 83.3
44% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 137
14% 112 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 930M
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.8
7% 8.33 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 368 383 434 433 442 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63% Good
Read 287
Write 279
Mixed 264
SusWrite 400
70% 308 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 13.2
65% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 281
184% 210 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JF Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback