Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '23 at 19:56
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 109 2-Core 197 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 587 59% 478 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.1% Average	Lighting 58 Reflection 54.4 Parallax 78.6 47% 63.7 fps	MRender 57.6 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 42.6 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: 033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 386 400 415 434 369 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 389 Mixed 374 SusWrite 396 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 41 142% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 288 236% 336 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 189 189 190 189 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 182 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 188 108% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CML8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1920 1080	AOC2702 27G2G3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	18x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 838 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $395

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16