Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics224% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 15:08
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,001
93% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,390
86% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$774
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
224% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 334
Parallax 404
253% 350 fps
MRender 481
Gravity 297
Splatting 213
256% 330 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 224%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,859
Write 1344
Mixed 513
272% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 58.4
202% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 1,125
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 680
620% 947 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
108GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 146
Mixed 170
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 39.9
130% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 125
96% 129 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 435
Mixed 411
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 48.2
143% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,865
Write 3,570
Mixed 2,589
743% 3,342 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 78.7
284% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,536
DQ Write 1,422
DQ Mixed 1517
1,128% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 237% Great: 633%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 10.5
Mixed 7
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
58% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 26
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM0F55 C32JG5x
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback