MSI PRO B550-VC (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI PRO B550-VC (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 03:50
Run Duration395 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 180
2-Core 350
111% 207 Pts
4-Core 691
8-Core 1,330
120% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 2,292
142% 2,292 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
MSI(1462 3961) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 180
Parallax 407
151% 258 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 198
Splatting 263
214% 263 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
156GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1033 1342 1455 1444 1503 1514 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,482
Write 1,397
Mixed 2,101
SusWrite 1382
412% 1,841 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 92.9
300% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 967
725% 971 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 321%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
171GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,933
Write 9,734
Mixed 10,283
2,372% 10650 MB/s
4K Read 492
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 328
1,307% 363 MB/s
DQ Read 1,627
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1,168
929% 1,309 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2452 1903 1915 1881 1906 1922 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,503
Write 2,544
Mixed 3,000
SusWrite 1,997
567% 2,511 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 99.7
325% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 908
682% 917 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 364%
Great: 477%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 182 180 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 181
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 180
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 195 190 196 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 127
Write 197
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 194
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 184 183 179 185 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 130
Write 180
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 182
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 189 190 190 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 130
Write 138
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 190
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
133% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 119 114 119 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 116
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 117 115 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 116
68% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 176 173 176 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 135
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 176
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
484% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
734GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 85 84 86 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 177
Write 180
Mixed 134
SusWrite 86.3
191% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
135% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 64%
ST5000DM 003-2FH18L 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 85 84 85 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 67.4
Write 96.4
Mixed 114
SusWrite 86
130% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 42.4
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 37.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 128%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5B96 LG HDR QHD
Typical PRO B550-VC (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO B550-VC (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback