HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 00:34
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 460
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 164 164 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 480
Mixed 403
SusWrite 167
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 47.5
158% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 359
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAONS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 118 117 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 47 60 23.5" 1280 720 VIZ1031 D24hn-G9
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback