HP MP9 G4 Retail System AMS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP MP9 G4 Retail System AMS  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83EF
Memory16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 23:03
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 174
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 271
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
HP(103C 83EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.57 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 394 382 387 383 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 1,426
Mixed 1,132
SusWrite 507
252% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 41.7
128% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 409
305% 413 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 147%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK - [0x] 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 19.4" 1280 720 DELD03B DELL E2014H
Typical MP9 G4 Retail System AMS Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP MP9 G4 Retail System AMS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback