ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 20:24
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 261
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 591
72% 551 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 196
Parallax 189
173% 199 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 144
Splatting 127
123% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 145%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X6001T 1TB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 379 333 36 92 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 493
Write 430
Mixed 406
SusWrite 204
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 28.9
135% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 45.5
93% 182 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 406 407 469 468 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 471
Mixed 394
SusWrite 430
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50.2
174% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 248
214% 317 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
13GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 137 130 131 124 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 83.1
Write 131
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 125
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 37.3
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 35.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 29 165 27" 1280 720 HWV62F5 XWU-CBA
Typical One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO

System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback