Acer Swift SFG14-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-41  (all builds)
MotherboardBCU Dolphin_BCU
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 20:18
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 69.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 324
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 923
97% 777 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1620) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 28.5
7% 17.9 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 9.6
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 827 967 977 407 377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,125
Write 1,021
Mixed 922
SusWrite 753
215% 955 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 27.5
110% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 425
299% 383 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 140%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 26.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1408
Typical Swift SFG14-41 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFG14-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback