Maibenben MaiBook M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMaibenben MaiBook M  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta MaiBook M
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 14:16
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 51
1-Core 112
2-Core 233
69% 132 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 428
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Quanta(152D 1315) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 15.2
4% 9.53 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 14.1
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 964 965 1171 1216 725 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 980
Write 986
Mixed 959
SusWrite 999
222% 981 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 50.7
172% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 865
676% 929 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 196%
Great: 312%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical MaiBook M Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Maibenben MaiBook M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback