Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi Ultimate  (all builds)
Memory47.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 03:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 67.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 342
100% 193 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,222
113% 943 Pts
64-Core 2,256
140% 2,256 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 272
Parallax 295
228% 282 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 236
Splatting 177
195% 248 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 194%
Great: 230%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8842) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 177
Parallax 167
148% 175 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 137
Splatting 121
116% 144 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 130%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 452 476 387 370 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 883
Write 1,818
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 411
234% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 65.2
200% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 515
449% 679 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 158%
Great: 291%
Adata SU740 2TB
508GB free
Firmware: N200409a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 55 205 108 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 404
Write 112
Mixed 128
SusWrite 97
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 37
123% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 113
97% 148 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST4000NM0045-1VT107 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: TS05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 113 116 112 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 115
Write 125
Mixed 83
SusWrite 112
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
233% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 23.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical X470 Taichi Ultimate Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $693
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback