Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 109
2-Core 222
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 402
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 21.8
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.1
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F6+M.2 120 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 71 71 71 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 447
Write 88.8
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 65.1
37% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 1.5
51% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 22.1
DQ Mixed 2.9
19% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 80%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
111GB free
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 142 88 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 438
Write 179
Mixed 281
SusWrite 132
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 18.8
77% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 43.2
49% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 53%
Textorm B5 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 419 417 428 430 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 429
Mixed 411
SusWrite 422
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 29.9
129% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 45.8
89% 171 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
909GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 190 191 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 189
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 190
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 75 24.5" 1280 720 IVM6132 PL2530H
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback