HP Pro Tower 280 G9 PCI Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pro Tower 280 G9 PCI Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89B3
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 08:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 186
2-Core 331
105% 198 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,002
102% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,215
75% 1,215 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 89B3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 13
Parallax 10.1
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 12.7
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F8-512GD4 512GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPA01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 527 1039 523 679 882 852 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,314
Mixed 983
SusWrite 750
257% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 25.6
148% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 269
281% 460 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 176%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO2P32NC8W1-BEIS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPI0215 HP P22vb G4
Typical Pro Tower 280 G9 PCI Desktop PC Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro Tower 280 G9 PCI Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback