Monster ABRA A7 V6.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V6.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V6.2
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 08:18
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 107
2-Core 179
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 389
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
Clevo(1558 0170) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 6.3
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 371
Mixed 253
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 29.9
96% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 236
184% 253 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 89%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
85GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 182 151 103 133 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 200
Write 106
Mixed 85
SusWrite 154
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 10.3
45% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62
287GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 74 70 67 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 70.6
66% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 180 57 120 24" 1920 1080 AUS24C2 VG248
Typical ABRA A7 V6.2 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V6.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback