Lenovo 3578CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3578CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 03:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 165
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 300
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 122
Parallax 118
82% 114 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 103
Splatting 90.7
79% 97.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 7.6 114 100 73 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.4% Very poor
Read 2.7
Write 156
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 80
15% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 7.6
26% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
25% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 75 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0687 Acer ET322QU
Typical 3578CTO Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3578CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback