HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory12.7 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 22:34
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 47
2-Core 95.3
43% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 326
31% 257 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 62.4
49% 64.3 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 55.8
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 214 236 245 243 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 253
Write 190
Mixed 160
SusWrite 230
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 26.4
95% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 112
102% 156 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 89%
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 217 209 167 198 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 703
Write 587
Mixed 604
SusWrite 229
119% 531 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 49.2
159% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 499
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 423
314% 420 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 200%
USB DISK 3.2 64GB
49GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 11 14 12 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Read 33.4
Write 2
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 13.1
15% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.7
20% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 19.5" 1280 720 LEN60D9 LEN T2054pC
Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback