Medion Crawler E30

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion Crawler E30  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPx0PNJ
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 22:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 71.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 346
101% 195 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,065
106% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,556
96% 1,556 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Clevo(1558 866D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3758
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.1% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 71.9
69% 77.8 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 59.1
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-B47R 512GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2334 2238 1315 1064 158 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 2577
Mixed 1,390
SusWrite 1,207
372% 1,643 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 67.4
280% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 1,172
872% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 266%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS016G-3200ST Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 37
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE084D
Typical Crawler E30 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Crawler E30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback