Acer Aspire V5-573PG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-573PG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 13:00
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 106
51% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 119
18% 129 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 079B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 120GB-$91
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT41B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 399
Write 388
Mixed 266
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 33.2
110% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 154
140% 214 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
756GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 104 102 104 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 102
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 101
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6A-PB CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 11 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO31EC
Typical Aspire V5-573PG Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-573PG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback