Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 05:32
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 719
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
EVGA(3842 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 176
Parallax 180
141% 176 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 153
Splatting 130
126% 158 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 112 96 87 81 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 479
Write 202
Mixed 232
SusWrite 87
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 39.5
141% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 183
144% 206 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1816 1856 1898 1959 1982 2010 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 1,959
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,762
SusWrite 1,920
412% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 74.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 104
337% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1,226
919% 1,230 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 356%
Great: 526%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 125 131 131 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 91.4
Write 104
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 129
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 164 180 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 180
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 176
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 128 131 131 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 68.3
Write 120
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 132
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 27" 1920 1080 DEL4282 DELL G2723HN
Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback