Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 00:58
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 358
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 699
8-Core 1,257
118% 978 Pts
64-Core 1,580
98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 141
Parallax 134
108% 136 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 59 74 79 62 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 452
Write 118
Mixed 146
SusWrite 68.6
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 10.1
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 26.4
32% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 55%
Nvme-1tb SSD 1TB
395GB free
Firmware: T0828A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 1546 557 191 189 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1963
Write 1,626
Mixed 1,159
SusWrite 705
304% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 28.4
211% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 532
520% 821 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 225%
Great: 277%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
431GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1858 2038 2040 981 137 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 2163
Mixed 1884
SusWrite 1,188
396% 1754 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 83.1
276% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,447
DQ Write 1129
DQ Mixed 1,263
952% 1,280 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 287%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
622GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 148 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 172
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 152
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 120 24.1" 1280 720 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 6,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback