Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC7PJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 47.3
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 120
43% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 158
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.2
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 98 93 84 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 418
Write 408
Mixed 344
SusWrite 118
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 40.8
130% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 222
181% 261 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G_Skill F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 16% 73 74 55 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM571C W2443
Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback