HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B7
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 13:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Memory 16.8
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 84.3
28% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 72.5
8-Core 88.3
10% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 88.1
6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87B7) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH128HBHQ-000H1 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 285
Write 252
Mixed 247
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 14.8
52% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 109
82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.M8FR 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 441
9% 441 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14E5
Typical Laptop 14s-fq0xxx Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback